Those behind it have carefully constructed a well-orchestrated move to turn public opinion against Israel and the Jewish communities supporting Israel, and so far, it is working.
Opinion By James Marlow
Some of the coverage on the international news networks has been absolutely appalling. ITN reported on Tuesday, “Israelis have continued a second day of relentless bombing of Gaza, killing at least 24 Palestinians, 9 of which were children. “In response, Hamas fired a few rockets into Israel yesterday evening”.
Truth was, the “relentless” Hamas bombing of Israel lasted the entire Tuesday and all through the night. But in contract, Israel sought out military targets in Gaza with precision bombing.
On Monday, BBC Newsnight claimed that “dancing Israelis at the Western Wall were in celebratory mood after seeing, what they thought was the Al Aqsa Mosque on fire.”
Truth was, Palestinians who were rioting on the Temple Mount, set a large tree on fire, after a firework aimed at the police, missed its target. The “dancing Israelis” was the “celebratory mood” of Yom Yerushalayim.
On the same day, Al-Jazeera, a network I used to report for as an Israeli political analyst, portrayed the near lynching of an Israeli driver, close to the Lions Gate in Jerusalem as “an Israeli extremist settler who tried to kill Palestinians by running them down with in his vehicle.”
Truth was, the car was driving along the old city Jerusalem walls, when its driver and two passengers were suddenly pelted with rocks and metal objects.
As the vehicle tried to reverse and then move forward to avoid the barrage of at least 20 stone throwers from close range, the vehicle was surrounded and in a panic, the driver accelerated and hit two Palestinians as it mounted the kerb.
Al-Jazeera could easily see how the car was hit with a massive onslaught of rocks, but it purposely edited out that section and just showed how the driver ran down two Palestinians, both of whom got up and walked away.
If it wasn’t for a single traffic police officer, running down the street with his pistol in his hand, there is little doubt the 3 Israelis would have been lynched by the mob. The police officer had to fire in the air several times to keep the crowd back. But Al-Jazeera chose to spread lies and incitement in the worst way possible.
When covering the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians from a news point of view, how does one give the correct narrative as to who is right and who is wrong? It always seems to change depending upon when you start the clock.
This past week is a perfect example. If you start the timeline from Israel bombing Gaza, then Israel is clearly the aggressor. But if you take a step back in time and say, Hamas began firing rockets into Israel, then Hamas are the wicked ones.
But go back further and say, BUT the Israeli police stormed the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the holiest night of the year during Ramadan. Not only that, but they fired stun grenades and rubber bullets. In that case, Israel is the bad guy.
But then you take another step back and say: Palestinians began rioting with Molotov cocktails, rocks and fireworks several hours before riot police were anywhere near the scene.
GO back further: BUT the Israelis were trying to evict a family from Sheikh Jarrah.
BUT wait, an Israeli Yeshiva student, Yehuda Guetta, was shot along with two other student friends in his car, as he drove by the Tapuach junction. He later died in hospital from his injuries.
AND Israeli police put up barriers around the Damascus Gate, which infuriated Muslims who were heading to Al-Aqsa for Ramadan prayers.
BUT Hamas in the eight Palestinian cities of the West Bank used its influence to incite hatred and violence against Israelis so their young followers would post the attacks on Tik-Tok (social media).
AND another step back: Israel takes the land. Well the Arabs started the wars. But what about the rejection of the UN partition plan of November 1947. And before you know it, you are back to the forties when the news presenters will stop you and say, “But wait, let’s deal with the problem today”.
In short, the catalyst for the current violence is not really about Sheikh Jarrah because the Jewish community bought that land for 15,000 francs in 1876, but were removed by the Jordanian army in 1948 when the ethnic cleaning began.
In 1967, Jewish owners initiated legal proceedings to reclaim their property and in 1982 the court ruled, that they were the rightful legal owners. But in an act of clemency and compassion, the al-Kurds family were the rightful occupants and were granted “protected tenants” status.
This meant they could remain, as long as they agreed to register a tenancy agreement and pay rent to the owner. They did neither.
But on the subject of the current violence, we are witnessing a civil proxy war between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority, who are angry with President Mahmoud Abbas, who did exactly what I predicted – he cancelled the Legislative and Presidential elections.
Now each Palestinian faction is competing for “legitimacy” by demonstrating who can organize more violence against the Israelis.
With the Palestinian Authority calling for rioting against Israel in the name of “defending Al-Aqsa” Hamas had no choice but to compete for attention by attacking Israel. So Hamas (funded by Iran) unleashed the largest barrage of rocket attacks on Israeli civilians since 2014.
It’s difficult to see how this plays out in the coming days, as no doubt “international diplomacy” will step in. But the misinformation we are hearing on the news that the latest flair-up occurred because “Israelis stormed the Mosque”, may convince the majority, but it’s not the main reason this violence broke out.
Those behind it have carefully constructed a well-orchestrated move to turn public opinion against Israel and the Jewish communities supporting Israel, and so far, it is working.
How the media reports the Israeli-Gaza conflict.
James Marlow is absolutely right to highlight media distortion when reporting news of the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians. The BBC, particularly, has a duty to eschew bias and to have the wit to know when it is being used for propaganda. By selecting evocative photographs and language that carries more than a hint of moral judgement, the media colours the public’s view of Israel, so that rational discussion about the long-standing issues between Israelis and Palestinians gets lost in the media hype. It is essential to counter this influence by enlisting the support of politicians who are supportive of Israel’s sovereignty, and the many groups around the UK who have active members who will challenge the Anti-Zionist rhetoric of many misguided pro-Palestinian movements. Is there a political solution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict? The much vaunted “Two State Solution” sounds so dated and unlikely to ever be realised. Why would Israel accept a Palestinian state that is intent upon the destruction of the Jewish Homeland? Some may argue that the Palestinian may embrace democracy and such a state would distance itself from the professed odious credo of Hamas and Hezbollah, but knowing the volatility of many Arab countries, one could not guarantee extremists would not seize power and then Israel’s future would look bleak indeed. Perhaps there is hope in the recent rapprochement between Israel and the Gulf States. This initiative should be accelerated, not only in the service of realpolitik, but as a counter to Iranian influence in the Middle East.
It’s a well written description of today’s events. What the world has forgotten is that when in1948 The Jewish people were given back part of their homeland. Israel accepted this partition but not the Palestinians or should I say their landlords members of the Arab League, The Jordanians who owned the land and had the Palestinians as tenants urging them flee in order not to be massacred when the surrounding Arab States would annihilate the infant State of Israel and slaughter every man women and child and give it back to them, I was THERE IN EGYPT when Farouk ordered his soldiers to take his white horse to the front of the battlefield so that he would ride over their bodies and enter Jerusalem.. I HEARD IT BLARING. from all the Minarets. I do think that the Jihadists will ever give up whilst they can still muster sympathy by indoctrinating children to create mayhem and still earn the sympathy of the western world.